- 此摘要由 AI 通过多个网上来源生成。在“基于来源”下找到用于此摘要的来源链接。
详细了解必应搜索结果 此处组织和汇总搜索结果Miranda v. Arizona was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1966. The Court ruled that law enforcement must inform a person of their constitutional rights. This case established a code of conduct for police interrogations of criminal suspects held in custody.3 来源 Facts and Case Summary - Miranda v. Arizona - United States Courts
Learn about the landmark Supreme Court case that established the rights of criminal suspects in police custody. Find out the facts, the decision, and the impact of Miranda v. Arizona on the …
Miranda v. Arizona | Oyez
Learn about the landmark case that established the Miranda rights for suspects in police custody. Find out the facts, arguments, decision, and dissents of the 1966 ruling that changed the …
Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that law enforcement in the United States must warn a person of their constitutional rights before interrogating them, or else the person's statements cannot be used as evidence at their trial. Specifically, the Court held that under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the government cannot use a person's statements made in response to an interrog…
Wikipedia · CC-BY-SA 许可下的文字Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) - Justia US Supreme Court …
The landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona established the constitutional right to remain silent and to have an attorney present during police interrogation. The Court held that statements …
Miranda v. Arizona | Definition, Background, & Facts | Britannica
2025年1月8日 · Miranda v. Arizona, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 13, 1966, established the Miranda warnings, a set of guidelines for police interrogations of criminal …
miranda v arizona 的相关搜索