Terry v. Ohio: Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, a police officer may stop a suspect on the street and frisk him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer …

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably …

After being sentenced to three years in prison, the Petitioner (Terry)—one of the three men—appealed his case, arguing that his search was a violation of his Fourth Amendment …

2017年3月13日 · Terry v. Ohio was the landmark case that provided the name for the “Terry stop.” It established the constitutionality of a limited search for weapons when an officer has …

Terry and two other men were observed by a plain clothes policeman in what the officer believed to be "casing a job, a stick-up." The officer stopped and frisked the three men, and found …

Terry v. Ohio, U.S. Supreme Court decision, issued on June 10, 1968, which held that stop-and-frisk searches conducted without probable cause do not necessarily violate the prohibition of …

Later known as the “stop and frisk” case, Terry v. Ohio represents a clash between Fourth Amendment protection from intrusive, harassing conduct by police when no crime has been …

After being sentenced to three years in prison, the petitioner (Terry)—one of the three men—appealed his case, arguing that his search was a violation of his Fourth Amendment …

The Petitioner, John W. Terry (the “Petitioner”), was stopped and searched by an officer after the officer observed the Petitioner seemingly casing a store for a potential robbery. The officer …

2024年2月21日 · Terry was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon. A pretrial motion to suppress the evidence was denied. The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Judicial District …