Social Sciences; Psychology; Psychology questions and answers; Terry v. Ohio supported officers right to:question suspects with an attorney present.conduct a patdown or a frisk if they believe the person might be armed and dangerous. conduct a full-body cavity search of an individual who is not in custody.search vehicles upon probable cause to do so.

One of the most common activities of a law enforcement professional is encounters with the public. If the officer has facts to support that an individual is potentially dangerous, the officer is permitted to proceed according to Terry v. Ohio. In these encounters the officer must not act in such a way that escalates the situation but for the ...

The Tery vs. Ohio case is a US Supreme Court decision regarding the exceptions to the Fourth Amendment of the Constituiton thereby allowing the police personnel to carry a bodysearch of an individual in public places on grounds of any suspicions abo. …

For instance, in the case of Terry v. Ohio, the stop and frisk that the police officer conducted on the three individuals had most effectively prevented a crime from being committed as such individuals had been armed with deadly weapons. Such preventative action allowed lives to be saved and criminal activity from have taken place.

case brief on Terry v. Ohio 1 9 6 8 case, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, Here’s the best way to ...

The case of Terry v. Ohio provided police with a way to “stop” and/or “frisk” individuals without a warrant and based on “reasonable suspicion” that is less than probable cause. Explain whether you feel that this standard is appropriate, and be sure to support your opinion.

Answer to a a. 28. When making a stop based on reasonable. a a. 28. When making a stop based on reasonable suspicion, the police officer has the right to conduct a search: a automatically b. whenever the officer believes it is necessary c. whenever the officer has reasonable suspicion the person is armed d. only if there is probable cause that the person is armed 29.

SOLUTION; Terry v. Ohio is one of the most important precedents in the United States history and has had a profound impact on the development of police-state tactics. Terry is directly relevant to law enforcement since its primary purpose was to …View the full answer

QUESTION 8 If a police officer based on his or her 20 years of experience, is suspicious of an individual, and stops that individual to ask for ID and conduct a brief pat-down search, they have not violated the 4th amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures (based on the ruling in Terry v. Ohio) because it is deemed ...

The U.S. Supreme Court case Terry v Ohio broadened the probable cause clause to include . . .Hint.a. reasonable suspicionb. imminent likelyhoodcthe most certainly the dude is a punk doctrine.d. preponderance of the evidence