exegesis - How do opponents of penal substitutionary atonement …
2016年5月24日 · Swedenborg and the various Swedenborgian denominations explicitly reject substitutionary atonement theories such as Anselm's Satisfaction theory of atonement and the Penal Substitution theory that developed within Protestantism. Background: Isaiah 52:13-53:12 in its original context and meaning
How does the Catholic Church view Penal Substitutionary …
The penal substitutionary view of the atonement holds that the most fundamental event of the atonement is that Jesus Christ took the full punishment that we deserved for our sins as a substitute in our place, and that all other benefits or results …
Is penal substitutionary atonement most prevalent among Calvinists?
2016年5月19日 · All that aside, there is quite a bit of scholarship that suggests the early church historically and uniformly embraced the theory of ransom atonement well before penal substitutionary atonement. The oldest theory is the Ransom Theory...It held sway for a thousand years. - The Cross of Christ by Vincent Taylor
Which theory of the atonement did C. S. Lewis hold?
Substitutionary atonement is also clearly seen in Miracles: He tasted death on behalf of all others. He is the representative 'Die-er' of the universe: and for that very reason the Resurrection and the Life. [...] Because Vicariousness is the very idiom of the reality He has created, His death can become ours. 5
church history - When was the term 'substitutionary atonement' …
2020年12月20日 · Much like the absence of the exact words "original sin" or "trinity" from the biblical text, the idea of substitutionary atonement is integral to both what God, in Christ, has done for us and how this work was typified for us in the Levitical system of worship. Substitute. a person or thing acting or serving in place of another. a·tone·ment
What is the Biblical basis for the "penal" in penal substitutionary ...
2016年5月23日 · The substitutionary character of the Atonement of Christ on the Cross is beautifully illustrated in the story of Barabbas in Matt 27:15-26 it was customary to liberate some notable criminal on Passover. They chose Barabbas, and Jesus was turned over to the Officers of the Law for death by crucifixion.
Which Protestant theologian first clearly formulated the penal ...
The Wikipedia article on Penal substitution states in its opening paragraph:. Penal substitution (sometimes, esp. in older writings, called forensic theory) is a theory of the atonement within Christian theology, developed with the Reformed tradition.
crucifixion - What is the difference between "ransom theory" and …
2015年10月21日 · Wikipedia ("Ransom theory of atonement") says that the theory teaches the ransom was "paid to Satan or to death itself, in some views paid to God the Father". The Eastern Orthodox church would teach that viewing the ransom paid to Satan or God the Father to satisfy him is wrong and perhaps heretical.
How do Calvinists account for Calvin's statements on atonement?
The article John Calvin's View of Limited Atonement by Roger Nicole concludes, after examining both sides' claims, that Calvin actually held to limited atonement and gives several reasons, mainly having to do with Calvin's strong covenantalism, trinitarianism, and belief in penal substitutionary atonement. Calvin also often stresses that Christ ...
Are there any Protestant denominations or churches that reject …
Not all Anglicans have held to Penal Substitution Theory. For example, the nineteenth to early 20th century Anglican bishop Charles Ellicott did not. See his commentary on Galatians 3, for example. The Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion does not express Penal Substitutionary Atonement.