OBJECTIVITY IN HISTORY I. INTRODUCTION There are, of course, all sorts of reasons for rejecting the possibility of objective knowledge of the past.1 But one reason has become particularly prominent in the later half of the twentieth century. In …
Objectivity in history (Chapter 5) - An Introduction to the ...
The legitimate criticism of the objectivity of historical facts is more concerned with when an occurrence is historical than with when it is a fact. It does not give grounds for doubts as to whether, after all, objectively true statements of fact about the past can actually be established.
By objectivity, we mean dispassionate, disinterested and scientific treatment of all events which would be depicted by a historian as if he was a judge pronouncing his verdict in the most impartial way without any fear or favour.
OBJECTIVITY IN THE DISCIPLINE OF HISTORY. - ResearchGate
2017年1月1日 · Objectivity serves as a methodological tool to prevent historians from reflecting bias and prejudice in their accounts. This work looks at the definition of history, nature of history,...
Scepticism against objectivity in history began to gain momentum in the United States, since the 1920s, when Carl Becker and Charles Beard started questioning the ability of historians to recreate an event as it had actually happened.
Van der Dussen and Rubinoffs timely and provocative anthology, Objectivity, Method and Point of View, began in a Trent University conference called to honor William H. Dray for his extraordinary contributions to critical philos- ophy of history.
up the concept of historical objectivity as such. The purpose of this paper is to define a concept of objectivity based on criteria of comparison, not on a given past. Objective interpretations are those which best meet rational criteria of accuracy, comprehensive-ness, consistency, progressiveness, fruitfulness, and openness. Finally, the ...
(DOC) Objectivity in History: Theories and how to be an objective ...
The paper explains the concept of history and objectivity in history, before taking a cursory look at the nature and methods of writing history. The study had suggested some measures to overcome the challenges facing the historian in achieving objectivity in history.
No one, then, can give an absolutely objective account of historical reality. What, therefore, should be the historian's aim when he approaches the past, and what are the conditions with which he should comply in order to attain the highest degree of objectivity? In the first place he should show a
Philosophy of history - Objectivity, Evaluation, Interpretation ...
Philosophy of history - Objectivity, Evaluation, Interpretation: Fundamental issues concerning the status of historical inquiry of the kind just mentioned arose in another crucial area of discussion, centring upon the question of whether—and, if so, in what sense—history can be said to be an objective discipline.
跳至内容