Avro Lancaster vs Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress Comparison - Military Factory
2 x 0.50 caliber Browning heavy machine guns in powered Sperry ball turret. Maximum internal bombload of 7,983 kg (17,600 lb). Side-by-side comparison of the Avro Lancaster against the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress.
Lancaster vs B-17: Which One Would You Want to Fly In?
2023年10月28日 · If you had the choice, which iconic aircraft would you want to fly in? The Avro Lancaster or the B-17 Flying Fortress? Let’s compare how these two measure up against each other. Bomb Load & Bomb Sight Accuracy When it comes to bomb load, the Lancaster blows the B-17 out of the way. It can car
B-17 Flying Fortress vs Lancaster Bomber - World War Wings
2025年1月12日 · The American B-17 Flying Fortress and the British Avro Lancaster were two of the most effective bombers of WWII, each contributing significantly to the Allied victory. Despite their similar roles, they differed in design, performance, and mission focus.
Aerodynamics: B-17 vs Avro Lancaster - WW2Aircraft.net
2015年11月9日 · I think the B-17 was aerodynamically superior than the Lancaster, but became less so as each new variant spouted more guns. The earlier B-17s were able to fly faster on less power, but they also couldn't carry as big a bomb load.
Which bomber was better? B-17 or Lancaster? - AR15.COM
2021年5月20日 · Lancaster had larger payload and longer range. B-17 had higher ceiling and better defensive firepower. Speed was about even. I'm guessing the B-17 was more durable, but I could be wrong.
Out of the Big Three WW2 bombers (B-17, B-24, Lancaster), was …
2022年4月12日 · The Lancaster is not comparable to the B-17 and B-24 as it did not fly the same missions and it did not face the same threats. If the Lanc were going to fly daylight bombing missions, it would have needed the two-stage Merlin engines to get it up well above 20,000ft, and it would have needed all sorts of armour and heavier defensive armament.
WWII Bomber comparison I Flying Fortress vs Lancaster
2009年7月2日 · The comparison between B-17 and the Lancaster is a bit unfair. The B-17 is an early 30's design. While extremely advanced when it debuted, it was approaching obsolescence by 1942.
B-17 vs. He-177 vs. Lancaster - WW2Aircraft.net
2008年1月10日 · I think the Lancaster was the finest low-altitude heavy bomber of the war, the B-17 was the best high altitude heavy bomber of the ETO, and the 177 could have been great if the paired engine idea was given up after the first test flight (cut short due to engine overheating).
Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress Vs. Avro Lancaster-Which was …
2019年6月2日 · Competing against Douglas and Martin for a contract to build 200 bombers, the Boeing entry (prototype Model 299/XB-17) outperformed both competitors and exceeded the air corps' performance...
Which was better, B-17 or Lancaster in WWII? - YouTube
2024年8月14日 · B-17 vs Lancaster: WWII Bomber Showdown • WWII Bomber Showdown • Discover the debate over which WWII bomber reigned supreme - the B-17 Flying Fortress or the Avro Lancaster. Find out the...
- 某些结果已被删除