The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) interprets EU law to make sure it is applied in the same way in all EU countries, and settles legal disputes between national governments and EU institutions.

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (French: Cour de justice de l'Union européenne or " CJUE "; Latin: Curia[2]) is the judicial branch of the European Union (EU).

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is one of the EU’s seven institutions. It consists of two courts of law: the Court of Justice proper and the General Court. It is responsible for the jurisdiction of the European Union. The courts ensure the correct interpretation and application of primary and secondary EU law in the EU.

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) consists of two courts, the Court of Justice proper and the General Court, and it offers various means of redress, as laid down in Article 19 of the Treaty on European Union, Articles 251-281 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Article 136 Euratom, and Protocol No 3 ann...

Learn about the European Court of Justice’s traditions, scope, and unique Advocate General role. Glimpse behind the scenes of the massive EU case load in the Information Age, and compare fundamentals like sovereignty over states, the role of voting in chambers, and balancing accessibility and privacy. See full episode description and transcript.

It contains data on the universe of CJEU cases, proceedings, decisions, and judges. It covers the Court of Justice (CJ), General Court (GC), and Civil Service Tribunal (CST) for the Court's entire history (1952-2023).

That institution is the Court of Justice of the European Communities. It is composed of three courts: the Court of Justice (created in 1952), the Court of First Instance (created in 1988) and the Civil Service Tribunal (created in 2004).

On 5 February 2025, the Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its opinion in the case of C 413/23 P European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) v Single Resolution Board (SRB) (Opinion).

3 天之前 · “At the end of January, the CJEU delivered another judgment interpreting Directive 2008/48 on Consumer Credit. In C-677/23 AB, FB v Slovenská sporitel’ňa as consumers alleged that the credit contract did not contain all the necessary elements provided by the Directive. The dispute thus involved the interpretation of Article 10(2), which provided the mandatory content …

2025年3月11日 · On 27 February 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a landmark decision (C-537/23) addressing the validity of asymmetric jurisdiction clauses under Article 25 of the Brussels Recast Regulation.1 While the CJUE ruled that clauses requiring one party to litigate in one court while the other party has a choice for different forums can be …