I admired President Ronald Reagan’s support for free trade. He believed, like Adam Smith, that if trade was free, and people were allowed to choose between producers, they would choose higher ...

TimesMachine is an exclusive benefit for home delivery and digital subscribers. Full text is unavailable for this digitized archive article. Subscribers may view the full text of this article in ...

A set of legal and policy measures took effect in China on Wednesday as part of the country's efforts to advance high-quality ...

The zero-tariff policy aims to drive industrial cooperation ... agriculture, infrastructure, trade, and investment. This initiative has reportedly been put into effect, as China is set to ...

All indications are that free trade has gone the way of the typewriter and the pay phone ... The answer is a resounding yes.

But I think free trade is better for both consumers and producers, wherever they may be, and enhances peace as well. Reagan’s policy was better.

Under Bill Clinton’s leadership, the party enacted the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and normalized trade relations with China, policies that had devastating consequences for the ...

Reform UK leader tells The Telegraph he is ready to use contacts with incoming US administration to help efforts to avoid ...

President Xi Jinping called on Tuesday for further emancipating the mind in the construction of the Hainan Free Trade Port to ...

Speaking at the sensitisation programme on CNG infrastructural development at the Onne, Oil and Gas Free Zones, the Minister of Industry, Trade and ... public awareness, policy alignment and ...